I’ll Vote Against Mahama If He Debates Bawumia- Bridget Otoo

Bridget Otoo has vowed to vote against Mahama if he decides to debate Bawumia. A media celebrity said she won’t vote for John Mahama in the December 7 elections if he debates Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia, the New Patriotic Party leader. Bridget Otoo believes Dr. Bawumia doesn’t deserve the attention and called him “chronic, unrepentant, and untruthful.”

She posted, “If John Mahama debates Bawumia, I will vote against him!” Otoo suggested that if there should be a debate, it should be among candidates from other parties, not involving the National Democratic Congress (NDC). She pointed out that President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo won his election without participating in debates, which have been part of Ghana’s elections since 2000. Otoo stated, “Nana Addo did not participate in any debates, and he did just fine!”

Also read: List Of Celebrities Who Have Vowed To Vote For NDC In The 2024 Elections

Otoo feels that giving Bawumia a debate platform would be a mistake. She emphasized that debates have been a tradition in Ghana’s elections, organized by the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), but noted that candidates can still succeed without them.

Bridget Otoo also highlighted that debates should include candidates from different parties but exclude the National Democratic Congress (NDC). She believes that such debates could provide a fairer platform for other candidates without giving unnecessary attention to Bawumia.

Her stance has stirred discussions about the role and impact of debates in elections, and whether they truly benefit the candidates and voters. Otoo’s remarks underscore a broader debate on political discourse and media influence in shaping public opinion during elections.

Otoo’s statement also raises questions about the effectiveness and fairness of political debates in influencing voter decisions. Her opinion suggests that debates might sometimes elevate undeserving candidates, thereby distorting the electoral process.

Many people have reacted to Otoo’s comments, with some agreeing that debates can sometimes give undue prominence to candidates who may not be truthful or deserving of the spotlight. Others argue that debates are essential for democracy, providing voters with a platform to hear directly from those seeking office and assess their policies and character.

This controversy highlights the tension between media influence and political strategy. Otoo’s stance serves as a reminder of the power media personalities can wield in shaping public discourse and opinion. It also underscores the need for critical thinking and discernment among voters when evaluating political candidates and their platforms.

In summary, Bridget Otoo’s firm opposition to a Mahama-Bawumia debate, her characterization of Bawumia, and her call for debates to include other parties while excluding the NDC have sparked significant discussion. These conversations delve into the broader implications for political strategy, media influence, and the democratic process in Ghana.